There was a house fire 3 blocks from here. It was a Victorian home, built of brick and wood.
It burned for several hours.
A demolition crew had to come the next day to TEAR IT DOWN because despite being more than 100 years old, and NOT MADE OF STEEL OR CONCRETE, it was STILL STANDING.
The houses on either side of the burned out building, also Victorian homes, only have black soot and smoke damage on the outside brick. They're still standing.
Concrete & steel vs. 100 year old wood and CLAY bricks.
How did WTC7 not withstand some random fires? Looks like maybe building codes are different these days?
THIS IS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION: HOW DOES A CENTURY OLD HOME STAY ERECT, BUT A 40 SOMETHING OFFICE BUILDING CAN'T?
The continued spouting of bullshit on this site only leaves one the ability to come up with 2 conclusions about "troofers".
1. They have not read one word of any or all information regarding the facts about what happened on 9/11 because they are afraid it will prove them wrong and GWB isn't at fault...
or...
2. They're clinically mentally ill from drinking greeeen anti freeze provided by eGore.
We aren't afraid of the truth because we only know what is true. It is the Trufers that don't beleive the true story. That's your problem - ball in your court. Put up or shut up.
Put up what? We do not purport to know what happened on 9/11 because the Governments investigation was incomplete and biased. What part of the term "cover-up" don't you understand?
And it' not about hating Bush, that's a separate issue...
"We've read the information, it's incomplete and a cover up."
No, you have not.
If you'd read the information from witnesses about what happened to WTC 7 you'd know there was a 20+ story gash in the front of it.
You'd know that it was a unique design to allow for construction over a power substation that was not designed to have that large a building constructed over it.
You'd know that there was a pressurized fuel line for emergency power generators that fed the fire for almost 8 hours.
You'd know that they knew the building was going to come down before approx noon that day from the damage inflicted by the spire from the tower.
Proved my point perfectly..you goof balls keep trying to equate things that have absolutely NOTHING to do with 9/11 as though they all have some mysterious something or other in common.
Typical tactics when your side of a debate has no basis in fact.
You still can't answer a simple question without twisting, diverting, obsfucating, and avoiding a straight, single point.
Before 9/11, when have airliners ever crashed into 110 story buildings? Very simple question...for simple minds...
"Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th; malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists, themselves, away from the guilty." - President Bush Speaks to United Nations, November 10, 2001 "We don't know what we don't know." -Donald H. Rumsfeld
"This site & all these moron conspiracy theorists have accomplised (sic) what they set out to do-raise doubt. No proof is necessary-just doubt." - Anonymous, 7/28/2007
"In light of that sorry record of the propagandistic exploitation of the 9/11 tragedy for partisan political purpose, is it any wonder that large numbers of Americans have doubts about all of it and that a considerable industry of documentaries and investigative reports has sprung up with alternative theories ranging from the plausible to the absurd? http://www.commondreams.org" -Robert Scheer, 9/11/2006
40 comments:
What dopes! Maybe they never saw the WTC 7 collapse tapes.
All it takes is a couple of hours worth of fire damage to part of the building an POOF! Down it goes.
...yeah and with some magic pixie dust coating and a laser, it's really cool under a black light..
Looks like we are right, again.
Burn baby, burn.
No, it looks like you're "left" again.
...yeah...left alright...as in left behind.
Yawn, that's the best you've got?
Goofy whack job conspiracy nuts aren't worth my best.
zzzzzzzzz...
"Ya got nothin!"
WTC7 was not brought down by CD. As simple as that.
If it's so "simple" where's the Final NIST report SIX YEARS AFTER THE FACT?
Six years after the fact? Exactly, right-the fact being it was a terrorist attack not an inside job or not a job that the govt. knew about.
Once again you missed the point by a mile.
There was a house fire 3 blocks from here. It was a Victorian home, built of brick and wood.
It burned for several hours.
A demolition crew had to come the next day to TEAR IT DOWN because despite being more than 100 years old, and NOT MADE OF STEEL OR CONCRETE, it was STILL STANDING.
The houses on either side of the burned out building, also Victorian homes, only have black soot and smoke damage on the outside brick. They're still standing.
Concrete & steel vs. 100 year old wood and CLAY bricks.
How did WTC7 not withstand some random fires? Looks like maybe building codes are different these days?
THIS IS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION:
HOW DOES A CENTURY OLD HOME STAY ERECT, BUT A 40 SOMETHING OFFICE BUILDING CAN'T?
Great point!! And exactly what prompted us to start this discussion in the first place.
The "theories" that the government puts forth about WTC 1,2 and 7, defy
logic.
...and if the naysayers want it, I can provide photographic evidence, too.
Great idea. We will post.
Just watch "Screw Loose Change" and all you questions will be answered.
Years later, and the "experts" still can't prove that something other than the official terrorist attacks cccured.
Where's the 7WTC NIST final report, Lee?
Never mind "final report" -- where's the first chapter?
lee, my "house on fire" is about Building 7. neither were hit by airplanes.
The continued spouting of bullshit on this site only leaves one the ability to come up with 2 conclusions about "troofers".
1. They have not read one word of any or all information regarding the facts about what happened on 9/11 because they are afraid it will prove them wrong and GWB isn't at fault...
or...
2. They're clinically mentally ill from drinking greeeen anti freeze provided by eGore.
...morons.
We've read the information, it's incomplete and a cover up.
What's the problem with a REAL INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION?
What are you afraid of?
The truth?
We aren't afraid of the truth because we only know what is true. It is the Trufers that don't beleive the true story. That's your problem - ball in your court.
Put up or shut up.
Put up what? We do not purport to know what happened on 9/11 because the Governments investigation was incomplete and biased. What part of the term "cover-up" don't you understand?
And it' not about hating Bush, that's a separate issue...
It is the Trufers that don't beleive the true story.
"Story" is right as in FICTION.
"We've read the information, it's incomplete and a cover up."
No, you have not.
If you'd read the information from witnesses about what happened to WTC 7 you'd know there was a 20+ story gash in the front of it.
You'd know that it was a unique design to allow for construction over a power substation that was not designed to have that large a building constructed over it.
You'd know that there was a pressurized fuel line for emergency power generators that fed the fire for almost 8 hours.
You'd know that they knew the building was going to come down before approx noon that day from the damage inflicted by the spire from the tower.
You don't know jack...
"If you'd read the information from witnesses about what happened to WTC 7 you'd know there was a 20+ story gash in the front of it."
Go back look at the Oklahoma Fed building bombing, the WHOLE front was blown off, yet it did not "implode"
Next!
"You don't know jack..."
Glad you proved my point. TY
Um, it doesn't seem like your point was proven at all.
Proved my point perfectly..you goof balls keep trying to equate things that have absolutely NOTHING to do with 9/11 as though they all have some mysterious something or other in common.
Typical tactics when your side of a debate has no basis in fact.
You still can't answer a simple question without twisting, diverting, obsfucating, and avoiding a straight, single point.
Before 9/11, when have airliners ever crashed into 110 story buildings? Very simple question...for simple minds...
Simple mind is right.
Glad you realize your own shortcomings. So answer the question.
When have Steel and Concrete buildings collapsed after burning for an HOUR?
Just can't do it can ya'?
"You still can't answer a simple question without twisting, diverting, obsfucating, and avoiding a straight, single point.
Before 9/11, when have airliners ever crashed into 110 story buildings? Very simple question...for simple minds..."
Come on...I dare ya'.
no, but what does that have to do with anything including 7WTC?
Have any steel and concrete buildings ever COLLAPSED due to fire before?
When has a building ever collapsed into the path of MOST resistance, Einstein?
Compared to you....yes, I am Einstein.
Then maybe you could answer that question...
It has nothing to do with 9/11. Why waste the time?
We thought "wasting time" was your forte...
Post a Comment