Saturday, August 11, 2007

This Just In...(13 years ago)

"It's a quagmire..."

5 comments:

H Nicole said...

Loving it, Shoes, as usual!

Here is a good web site that I have only just now discovered that does a good job reviewing the so-called in-fighting within the 9/11 Truth Movement:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php

The site is hosted in the UK by Englishman Andrew Johnson. He gives an honest and open personal account of his interactions with many leading members of the 9/11 Truth Movement in the US in an article listed on his homepage called "The New 9/11 Hijackers?"

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=28

The article is a little shocking in that it implicates very big names in the 9/11 Truth Movement as being "operatives," like Steven Jones (I have no problem believing this of Jones, however, from my own personal experiences) and even David Ray Griffin (whom I myself have supported on this blog).

Anyway, what originally led me to this site was a link to an article there on molten steel written by fellow blogger on this S4I site, CB Brooklyn:

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=91&Itemid=60

My own focus has been on trying to get to the bottom of the "molten steel" story in the 9/11 Truth Movement, since the presence of molten steel seems to be a required phenomenon in support of two of the three leading explanations for how the towers came down -- mini-nukes and thermite. This is very important to me because, unlike the third leading method of destruction -- directed energy weapons -- these other two methods of destruction are not nearly as clear as to whom may have actually pulled the trigger.

At least it is now a little clearer to me why these other two modes of destruction are being so heavily pushed upon the public despite very shake evidence of molten steel, and why the idea of directed energy weapons is being so heavily attacked.

Shoes4Industry said...

Thanks! We here at S4I don't subscribe to any one scenario or "theory" other than what we have been told by the government leaves much to be desired!
It's like having O.J. investigate whole killed Ron and Nicole...

moneysmith said...

The checktheevidence site is great, hnicole! Thanks! Hours of fascinating reading.

Richard said...

That was then, this is now. Maybe 13 years ago SH was not worth it. Flash ahead to 2001 and things sure did change- according to the Dems. as well as the Republicans.

Shoes4Industry said...

what hasn't changed is Cheney's prediction of what would happen if we invaded Iraq...

pretty astounding