Richard Gage, AIA, founder of the group, 'Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth,', takes you through a stunning presentation of solid evidence that the collapses of WTC 1, 2 & 7 could only have been the result of controlled demolition.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
46 comments:
Did you watch the video?
Gage is NOT saying that "the US Gov brought the towers down," what he is saying is the governments "THEORY" of how the buildings collapsed, leave a lot of unanswered and troubling questions.
I urge you to take the time to view the video, then comment.
Thank you.
Science too complicated for you, lifebeginsat200mph? Prefer to think in simpleton terms, like "black vs. white?" Imbeciles like you are the reason this country is in the shape it is today. Watch the video, moron, then comment. Oh, wait, you're probably too busy doing important stuff, like denying global warming and evolution. Watch out, those stem cells might bite you in the ass!
You get a better download of this video on the 911Truth.org web site, for some reason. On the right track, but Gage fumbles whenever he gets to the actual mechanisms for controlled demolition, for good reason. See what Dr. Judy Wood has to say about the thermite and molten steel story (drjudywood.com). Add a new word to your vocabulary now because it is going to be the word of the century -- dustification. Gotta love some of Dr. Judy's other new words, too (for a new phenomenon), like "fuming" and "lathering." Please ignore that she can act a little kooky (can't blame her after her student Michael Zebuhr was murdered for speaking out for 911 Truth and after she was fired from Clemson for speaking out for 911 Truth). She nevertheless still has THE BEST site and the best collection of pictures for getting at the nitty gritty of the evidence for all three towers. Just look at all her pictures (go straight to her "dust to dirt" collection), follow along with them with her corresponding audio from the talk shows with Fetzer, especially the most recent one on July 19. Keep an open mind. Peace Out.
I have watched many of these videos. I do not know what it will take to wake people up. The truth is so obvious. I am thankful for groups like ae911truth that have a backbone and fight in this country.
Please spread the word, Robotsrus.
That's what it's going to take!
H Nicole said...
You get a better download of this video on the 911Truth.org web site, for some reason. On the right track, but Gage fumbles whenever he gets to the actual mechanisms for controlled demolition, for good reason. See what Dr. Judy Wood has to say about the thermite and molten steel story (drjudywood.com).
I have updated the size of all the videos and added a link to Dr. Judy Wood. Good post!
Thanks
Former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood filed a Request for Correction with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) regarding the 9/11 NIST Report. Dr Wood cites fraud and deception, and shows clear evidence that the World Trade Center was destroyed by directed energy weaponry.
Dr Judy Wood is represented by attorney Jerry Leaphart.
Dr Wood's Request for Correction (RFC) is archived on the US Government's Department of Commerce website in PDF format:
RFC (March 16, 2007)
Supplement#1 (March 29, 2007)
Supplement#2 (April 20, 2007)
What could be keeping the Government from responding to Dr. Wood?
Hmmmmm....
actually, NIST responded to Dr Wood stating they need more time!
See here for NIST's email to Dr Wood
Also, the Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico says Dr Wood's research is "interesting and worthy of further consideration"!
See here for FAX sent to Jerry Leaphart
CB_Brooklyn
a closer look at LifeBeginsAt200MPH's blog reveals his love of Fox News and Ann Coulter
Looks like we'll have to wait until
the end of the year to hear what happened to WTC 7
On June 29, 2007, NIST issued a press release announcing that its final report on the collapse of WTC7 would be issued by the end of the year.
What could POSSIBLY happen between NOW and then? Why is it taking SO LONG? Perhaps Catherine Fletcher (catherine.fletcher@nist.gov) could shed some light on this if someone asks her?
Dr Wood has a new WTC 7 page here
Very interesting analysis!
btw, does anyone know that NIST contracted with Applied Research Associates (ARA) for the 9/11 NIST report?
Not only is ARA a manufacturer of directed-energy weapon technology,
but are also a founding sponsor of Directed Energy Professional Society (DEPS).
DEPS, founded in 1999, put out their first newsletter one year before 9/11.
An excerpt from this newsletter is as follows:
"Lasers in space, lasers in the stratosphere, lasers on and over The battlefield - we're at the beginning of an evolutionary new wave of weaponry."
PDF File
CB_Brooklyn
"We must speak the truth about terror. Let us never tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories concerning the attacks of September the 11th, malicious lies that attempt to shift the blame away from the terrorists themselves, away from the guilty.
-George W. Bush's first address to the General Assembly of the United Nations in New York City, Nov. 10, 2001
S4I: and they're listed under "higher learning." It think that means one needs to be high to agree. Or maybe it's a reverse technique to wake up the sound asleep.
Oh, that's rich -- Bush warning against "malicious lies." Kind of sums up his reign of terror, no?
another company NIST contracted with was SAIC, also a manufacturer of directed energy weapons
Please consider the links between Gage, Steven Earl Jones and the Energy Issue. CB Brooklyn has collected some important links/info here:
http://drjudywood.co.uk/articles/cc/CB.html
Also, see an amazing discussion which took place recently between Dr Bill Deagle and SE Jones.
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/Jones-Deagle-MiniNukesvsThermate-etc.htm
Some of it is bizarre....
More background to all this here:
http://www.checktheevidence.com/911/TheNew9-11Hijackers.htm
(long...!)
Andrew Johnson
The weak part of Gage's presentation is his reliance on the thermate explanation. He mentions the high degree of pulverization, yet fails to offer any evidence that thermate has the ability to produce this result.
He also fails to provide any scenario under which pools of metal could have remained in a molten state for six weeks. This claim has such a high degree of improbability that it simply has to be addressed. He accepts as fact the accounts of molten metal even though these accounts severely strain our credulity.
I saw this website on Rosie O'Donnell's blog. So, this is where she picked up all the BS she used to "spew" about on the View.
Thank God that woman does not have a national audience anymore!
I guess all those phone calles to ABC and sponsors really paid off. The audience at home finally got fed up with her anti-American rants. And she always thought the majority sided with her.
Does this site miss her as their token spokesperson?
We think she does and will continue to have a "national audience." Every one is entitled to their own "views", yes, kathie, even you. (I guess you missed the point of the show, and BTW if you check closer, you will find Ms. O'Donnell left the show of her own accord.)
Thank you for you insightful comments, please stop back anytime, with more.
Shoes: No, Rosie does not have a national TV audience.
Rosie left on her own accord because she didn't want to back down on her anti-American rants. ABC & sponsors were flooded with calls &e-mails and ABC was a little nervous(if you recall, this was right at the time Imus was fired). So, she wouldn't agree, & decided not to sign the contract.
And yes, everyone is entitled
to their "view" but E was not permitted to express her view because it wasn't Rosie's view. I saw the show that day & Rosie had steam coming out of her ears. E did to her what she had been doing to E for the past year. For once, she didn't get the last word in and she couldn't take it.
Question, again-Does this site miss her as their spokesperson?
Rosie was a poster child for libs. that day. She couldn't take any contradiction so she took her ball & went home. No loss there.
Rosie left on her own accord because she didn't want to back down on her anti-American rants. Since when is questioning an obviously suspicious government "theory" anti-American? It seems to us that the American thing TO DO is to question authority and not go along BLINDLY believing everything we are told. Or don't you agree?
Rosie O'Donnell has every right to speak her mind in the free-marketplace of ideas. And, just like her, so do you.
ABC has been unable to come to a contractual agreement with Rosie O'Donnell. As a result, her hosting duties on "The View" will come to an end mid-June.
"They wanted me three years, I wanted one year, and it just didn't work," said O'Donnell on today's show.
Despite controversy -- or maybe because of it -- O'Donnell was good business for ABC, owned by the Walt Disney Co. Ratings for "The View" during February sweeps were up 15 percent in key women demographics over the same time in 2006.
Someone here obviously doesn't know how Hollywood works.
Obviously, you would know how Hollyweird works - all you libs. "work the same way". But this wasn't Hollyweird-it was New York & Disney (Florida).
Real Americans got tired of her bullshit & YOU blindly believe what Rosie says. Do you really think she would admit she was given a little "shove"?
And by the way, the ratings have not gone down since she ran away.
Uh, maybe that's because it's called show "business" and they know what they're doing. They didn't replace Rosie with a snivelling wimp, did they? NO, they got a loud, outspoken DEMOCRAT to take her place.
So, you can talk about all the letter writers and phone calls flooding ABC (by the way, how do you know that? work in the mailroom do ya?) but the only reason the ratings didn't go down is because they got amazing guest hosts like Whoopi and Kathy Griffin to hang around until ABC could figure out a way to KEEP MAKING MONEY OFF OF ROSIE AND HER DEPARTURE.
kathie said But this wasn't Hollyweird-it was New York & Disney (Florida).
Kathie, Kathie, Kathie, we sure hope that you are as cute as your comments! "Florida"...priceless.
People, why all the bickering over Rosie, when there are actual architects and engineers questioning what happened on 9/11? Do you think they aren't qualified to comment on the "official" story? In just a few months, that group has grown from zero to more than 100 members. Aren't you at least a little curious about why there would be so many professionals asking for a new investigation?
Shirley: The View was successful BEFORE Rosie and will be successful AFTER Rosie. And if you are referring to DEMOCRAT Whoopie- great. I've seen her on the show and at least she lets E give her VIEW. Remember conseratives don't have a problem with opposing views-libs. do.
Moneysmith: So, let me get this straight. The engineers that are questioning 9/11 are professionals but the man on the site that explained 9/11 for the goverment is a "terp"? HMMMMMMMMM!
Shirley: How do I know ABC & sponsors received complaints regarding Rosie? Well, I've read about & heard about it. Venture away from the blogs occasionally & maybe you'll realize there are TWO sides to every story.
Kathie sez So, let me get this straight. The engineers that are questioning 9/11 are professionals but the man on the site that explained 9/11 for the goverment is a "terp"? HMMMMMMMMM!
Please take the time and read the report for YOURSELF, see if you find anything in it lacking. And the explain to us what "Global Collapse" is and how it happens. The "man on the site" does not.
Thank you!
Kathie- Did you watch the video?
Kathie said...
"Remember conseratives don't have a problem with opposing views-libs. do."
Let's see...how can I respond to this statement...oh, I know:
Hello, Pot? This is Kettle....you're black.
-and-
"How do I know ABC & sponsors received complaints regarding Rosie? Well, I've read about & heard about it."
From FOX?
-and finally-
"Venture away from the blogs occasionally & maybe you'll realize there are TWO sides to every story."
You are assuming, of course, that I DON'T do anything but sit here reading Liberal blogs.
Give me a break.
Meanwhile the bigger question(s) go unanswered. What REALLY happened on 9/11? It's obvious from the material presented here, and elsewhere, that what we have be told is either a half/truth or outright lie.
It's amazing that so many otherwise intelligent Americans would be so opposed to raising this question.
I am referring specifically to the Democratic majority who are by nature smarter, more creative, used to questioning authority!
It's a mystery almost as baffling as Sept 11 itself.
Meanwhile the bigger question(s) go unanswered. What REALLY happened on 9/11? It's obvious from the material presented here, and elsewhere, that what we have be told is either a half/truth or outright lie.
It's amazing that so many otherwise intelligent Americans would be so opposed to raising this question.
I am referring specifically to the Democratic majority, who are by nature smarter, more creative and more apt to question authority!
It's a mystery almost as baffling as Sept 11 itself.
Maybe many intelligent Americans (we'll include a few of those "more creative" Democrats) aren't questioning 9/11 because there is NOTHING to question.
Then you (and they) have obviously no looked (objectively) at the reports or the footage or the photos.
Please do.
If there's "nothing to question," lee, then why did membership in Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth go from 1 member to nearly 150 professionals and more than 300 supporters, including A/E students, in just a few months? Why is there a similar group of professional pilots who question the events and official story?
And then there's this, from wikipedia:
"A May 2006 Zogby public opinion poll indicated that:
42% of Americans more likely agree with people who believe that ‘the US government and its 9/11 Commission concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence that contradicts their official explanation of the September 11th attacks, saying there has been a cover-up.’
"On September 3, 2006: Time Magazine published a lead article, "Why the 9/11 Conspiracies Won't Go Away", noting that:
The 9/11 Truth Movement is larger than you might think. A Scripps-Howard poll of 1,010 adults last month found that 36% of Americans consider it "very likely" or "somewhat likely" that government officials either allowed the attacks to be carried out or carried out the attacks themselves. Thirty-six percent adds up to a lot of people. This is not a fringe phenomenon. It is a mainstream political reality.
What is so "unpatriotic" about questioning the government and their story or 9/11? It seems like it would be the right, if not the obligation, of every citizen to question their account.
Are we a nation of sheep?
Unfortunately, it looks like many Americans are.
Sheep or lemmings....
There is nothing wrong with questioning the govenment. Problem is you don't question you "accuse". Big difference.
You would NEVER be satisifed with any answers the government would give to your "questions" because they are NOT the answers you are looking for. Their answers don't fit your agenda.
The only agenda is truth, Lee.
An independent investigation is all anyone is asking for.
You don't actually think that the truth seekers WANT to be right, do you? It would be incredibly frightening if even a hint were true.
I think the truthers are doing there own independent investigation. Only problem is they have no facts.
Which would mean that you don't either.
We are only seeking the Facts and the Truth, what is wrong with that?
There is nothing wrong with questioning the government. Problem is you don't question you "accuse". Big difference.
The only thing we are 'accusing' anyone of, is not being truthful and forthcoming with the facts. Even a cursory look at the 9/11 report shows huge gaping holes in facts and logic.
You were given the facts. You just refuse to believe or accept them.
Some things just defy logic.
Like you and LB@200
Post a Comment