New studies of media coverage of the attacks on the Twin Towers have raised serious questions about the integrity of television broadcasts over CNN, CBS and FOX NEWS, according to Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a non-partisan society of students, experts, and scholars. “I used to think that the very idea of faking ‘live’ broadcasts was at least faintly absurd,” observed James Fetzer, the society’s founder.
New proof has appeared in “September Clues,” a series of studies of these broadcasts. “These six studies, each of which is less than ten minutes in length, make it very difficult to deny that something was amuck on 9/11,” Fetzer added, "We have also linked to them from our web site, 911scholars.org".
Saturday, July 28, 2007
Mounting Evidence of 9/11 Video Fakery: New proof of media duplicity
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
21 comments:
This video is very compelling until you think about how many people would have to be involved in this coverup.
What about the families of the people that were passengers on the planes that were reported to have crashed?
We agree and hesitated to post this but it's compelling and thought- provoking viewing. Please, as with all the information here, use your own judgment and keep an open mind.
Thanks.
I'm certainly not sure I buy an overall media conspiracy--however, there is compelling evidence that some of the "amateur" videos (including ones not shown in the documentary) were faked. They are characterized by having multiple soundtracks, impossible-to-duplicate perspectives and so on. These videos are likely the pet projects of some bored tech geeks.
Because of the existence of these videos, the entire media coverage that day has been called into question. I can't possibly imagine how a media cover-up this large could occur, but I can see a few fake amateur videos getting shown on the air and serving as a catalyst for media conspiracy theories.
Well said Anon. No doubt some of the videos these conspiracy sites show are doctored. The mere fact they "show" how they have been doctored just proves that they can "doctor" them to suit their own purposes.
Having been a video producer and technician, among other things, all I see in most of their "amateur" videos are naturally occurring artifacts that are easily explainable in consumer/pro video circles.
Most people who "know" think that standard NTSC frame rates are 30 FPS..Frames Per Second. Not the case. It's actually 29.97 FPS with the "missing" part of the remaining frame being used for a sync signal between frames so the screen can refresh and give the appearance of a smooth "picture".
I've got 30 year old video tapes that had commercials edited out of them at the time and when you play them back, the program audio is still audible during the "pause" phase. Same thing can occur on my Brand new $2000+ Sony DVD-CD-DVR gee whiz camcorder doohickie.
Also easily explainable is the fact that color balance/temperature is the "reason" that most of the shots they use have different tints to them. Same for their "disappearing" backgrounds in some shots. It all depends on the aperture, lens quality, white balance and a dozen other factors, that they choose to overlook so the end results fit their "coverup".
The thought that all the MSM producers, technicians, CGI, Chyron ops, and the 1,000's of people that would have to be involved, and cover it up, without ONE leak, is ludicrous.
It does make one wonder though, doesn't it?
What is the government trying to hide? Why no INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION without White House oversight? Shouldn't anyone with a modicum of intellectual curiosity want an open, complete and non- POLITICAL investigation.
Not the whitewash and cover-up that we got.
Oh, and what about 7WTC?
"We hesitated to post this"? Really? I hardly believe that. Anonymous is exactly right-amateur videos could be fake & that turned into a complete media conspiracy. All of those videos only show that yes, videos can be altered (which was probably done on this site to spew the conspiracy theory).
"It does make you wonder, doesn't it"? No, actually it doesn't. Are we really to believe that every major news network & newpaper was in on this? Just because each of these outlets had employees who saw it happen?
Talk about the Bush administration trying to make us paranoid!
Ultra left-wing liberals (who always just love to blame America for everything) won't let this rest. They will only believe the so-called "whitewash & cover-up".Rosie O'Donnell supports all the BS on this site. Need I say more?
Dustification and TV fakery are two completely different topics. Separate the two now lest we all go down in TV fakery flames when the government releases much more reliable footage of planes hitting the towers and the pentagon. TV fakery may be a plant to distract from and discredit the far more credible evidence of dustification of WTC 1 and WTC 2.
Almost any entity can carry out TV fakery, and on a parallel thread, almost any entity can plant little "thermite" explosions here and there, but only one entity can carry out dustification, and the thought of that scares the %$#%& out of me, as it should everybody else. Keep your eye on the dustification ball, peeps!
Something hit the WTC towers and the towers acted like they were made of butter. Why? For the pentagon, it was the plane, not the building, that seemed to act like it was made of butter. Why? Could it be because the steel and concrete and aluminum involved in all these collisions was no longer acting like the steel and concrete and aluminum we all know and love so well? That's my best guess, though I hope like crazy I am wrong. I will gladly go down in flames as a whacky conspiracy theorist in exchange for being wrong on this any day!
It's a new world -- a post-dustification world -- with seemingly new laws of physics. Stretch your imaginations. Keep an open mind. Peace Out.
h nicole...since you seem to be about the only other person here with an open mind go to these links and study about "dustification".
http://www.debunking911.com/links
.htm
http://www.jnani.org/mrking/writing
s/911/king911.htm#_Toc144446004
http://www.daylightatheism.org
/2006/05/loose-marbles-i.html
http://screwloosechange.blogspot
.com/
http://ourworld.cs.com/mikegriffit
h1/refute.htm
What you'll find is that the VAST majority of the dust came from plaster in the sheetrock used in the towers.
There were tons and tons of concrete that weren't turned into dust as they would lead you to believe. Sheetrock is made up of mostly gypsum. And in it's raw form used in the production of sheetrock, it's in granular/powder/dust form.
No big mystery there as far as the "dustification" goes.
Sheet rock does not explode.
Metal does not melt at 500 degrees.
What about 7TC?
Peace, out.
I promise to check those sites out LB@200, if you promise to check out (and respond to) this web site concerning evidence of dustification phenomena observed at the pentagon as well...
http://stevenwarran.blogspot.com/2007/07/why-is-jeep-burned-to-crisp-in-opening.html
Just wondering if the terrorists attacks in '79,'83,'85'85,'88,'93,'96,'98,'&2000 were all planned by the government, too. Or don't they count because they weren't spectular enough?
There have been 6,300 worldwide attacks since 9/11. Is our government responsible for them,too? I think maybe the followers of the "religion of peace" are the guilty ones.
We are not saying that there is NO threat of terrorism, but let there be some reasoned perspective.
There are simply too many unanswered or half-answered question regarding the attacks on 9-11. Any reasonable, THINKING person would have to agree.
Why did none of other attacks you sight, cause us to invade Iraq?
Shoes: You won't like this answer.
The other attack sites didn't cause us to invade Iraq because Bush is the only pres. that had the guts to FINALLY do something about it and FIGHT BACK.
How much shit is the US supposed to take?
OK everyone, repeat after me: "Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda", again, "Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda", one more time, "Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda" now keep repeating it until it sinks in to your otherwise functioning brain...
Thanks!
repeat after me....
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
And yet you support Her Filthiness for President....sounds to me like there's somebody else in this room whose brain isn't functioning at full speed.
Au contraire, mon frère!
We here at S4I do NOT support the Clinton bid for the Whitehouse, we're actually very much opposed to it, probably more so than you are. It's your wet dream for Fred and Newtie to run against her, not ours.
KB@200: Do you REALLY believe shoes does not support Lady Hittlery? I certainly don't.
No support here. I will not vote for Hillary under any circumstances, and neither will shoes. She supports the phony "war on terra," so she gets zip.
Notice how no one on this site comments on the quotes that were made by Hillary & other dems. that said (among many other things) that Saddam was a threat & needed to be taken out. Do we ignore what we don't want to see or hear?
And your point is what?
Several of us already said we don't support Hillary, so who cares what she said? Some of us don't support the other Dems who thought the war was a good idea, either. They were wrong, the war is an abomination and BUSH owns it.
You will need to get behind us in condemning Hillary and anyone else who voted for this phony war in Iraq. This war is Bush's fiasco all the way the blood is on his hands and on the hands of anyone who supports him.
If your best argument is "what about the Clintons?" we feel sorry for you, you'll have to come up with something better than that.
Post a Comment