Thursday, July 26, 2007

Twin Tower Twins...

Thanks and a tip of the Shoes 4 Industry Hat to "Anonymous" for sharing this very interesting video with us...although we seem to have seen it somewhere before...

6 comments:

CB_Brooklyn said...

Has anyone seen these posts I made?


The Twin Towers did not "collapse", they were pulverized: HERE


Government Official at Kirtland Air Force Base Says Dr Judy Wood's 9/11 Directed Energy Weapon Research "Interesting and Worthy of Further Consideration"
HERE

Shoes4Industry said...

May 4, 2007: Leaphart receives the following FAX from the Director of Public Affairs at the Directed Energy Directorate, Kirtland Air Force Base (emphasis added):

===================================
MESSAGE: I received your fax yesterday and your FedEx package today, and had a chance to review the materials you sent. During our telephone conversation I outlined a variety of directed energies that might have future weapons applications but I'm not aware of any that are mature enough to cause the damage at the World Trade Center. Lasers are the most likely candidates for nearer-term weapons use and, to that enc, we have conducted laboratory tests to evaluate the effects of laser energy on different materials. For the most part, those materials have been metals, not concrete structures. Effects on metals are from the heat generated by an intense beam of coherent light, which cause the metals to weaken and split. Given sufficient heat, metals would melt (become liquids) and, given significantly more heat, could turn to gases. Since we haven't tested concrete I don't know if the effect would be dust. You report phenomena that we cannot explain here, either because we don't have enough data or because the phenomena are not within our area of expertise. While on a personal level I may find Dr Wood's investigation interesting and worthy of further consideration, on a professional level we are unable to devote our limited resources to activities outside of our charter, I wish you success in your endeavor and am available to answer whatever directed energy questions may arise.

Anonymous said...

I'm an "Anonymous" and I don't have a clue who LB@200 is.

LB@200. This site doesn't want to believe there is MORE than one person that disagrees with them so, I guess that's why they're lumping all anonymous together.

Shirley Heezgay said...

On the contrary "Anon" LB@200 often chose to present his argument by calling people names. He belittled and criticised and couldn't present his case without inciting defensive behaviour about everything BUT the nature of the post.

THAT'S why you don't see him here. You want to have a different opinion, go ahead, but don't go running your mouth in an arena that you didn't create.

shoes4industry said...

You can still find his "words of wisdom" over at www.lolprez.blogspot.com

(it's a comedy blog)

Lee said...

Shoes does some name calling, too. LB@200 did address the nature of the posts. It's just not what everyone here wants to HEAR.

And, he is not the only one "running his mouth".

"Running one's mouth" only seem's to be tolerated when that mouth agrees to what is being posted here.