Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Hmmmm - Looks Familiar...


Didn't they realize they could have just SET FIRE to the building and saved all those Explosives???!!!

40 comments:

moneysmith said...

What dopes! Maybe they never saw the WTC 7 collapse tapes.

Shoes4Industry said...

All it takes is a couple of hours worth of fire damage to part of the building an POOF! Down it goes.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

...yeah and with some magic pixie dust coating and a laser, it's really cool under a black light..

Shoes4Industry said...

Looks like we are right, again.

Burn baby, burn.

Lee said...

No, it looks like you're "left" again.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

...yeah...left alright...as in left behind.

Shoes4Industry said...

Yawn, that's the best you've got?

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Goofy whack job conspiracy nuts aren't worth my best.

Shoes4Industry said...

zzzzzzzzz...

Shoes4Industry said...

"Ya got nothin!"

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

WTC7 was not brought down by CD. As simple as that.

Shoes4Industry said...

If it's so "simple" where's the Final NIST report SIX YEARS AFTER THE FACT?

Lee said...

Six years after the fact? Exactly, right-the fact being it was a terrorist attack not an inside job or not a job that the govt. knew about.

Shoes4Industry said...

Once again you missed the point by a mile.

Shirley Heezgay! said...

There was a house fire 3 blocks from here. It was a Victorian home, built of brick and wood.

It burned for several hours.

A demolition crew had to come the next day to TEAR IT DOWN because despite being more than 100 years old, and NOT MADE OF STEEL OR CONCRETE, it was STILL STANDING.

The houses on either side of the burned out building, also Victorian homes, only have black soot and smoke damage on the outside brick. They're still standing.

Concrete & steel vs. 100 year old wood and CLAY bricks.

How did WTC7 not withstand some random fires? Looks like maybe building codes are different these days?

THIS IS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION:
HOW DOES A CENTURY OLD HOME STAY ERECT, BUT A 40 SOMETHING OFFICE BUILDING CAN'T?

Shoes4Industry said...

Great point!! And exactly what prompted us to start this discussion in the first place.

The "theories" that the government puts forth about WTC 1,2 and 7, defy
logic.

Shirley Heezgay! said...

...and if the naysayers want it, I can provide photographic evidence, too.

Shoes4Industry said...

Great idea. We will post.

Lee said...

Just watch "Screw Loose Change" and all you questions will be answered.

Years later, and the "experts" still can't prove that something other than the official terrorist attacks cccured.

Shoes4Industry said...

Where's the 7WTC NIST final report, Lee?

Shirley Heezgay! said...

Never mind "final report" -- where's the first chapter?

lee, my "house on fire" is about Building 7. neither were hit by airplanes.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

The continued spouting of bullshit on this site only leaves one the ability to come up with 2 conclusions about "troofers".

1. They have not read one word of any or all information regarding the facts about what happened on 9/11 because they are afraid it will prove them wrong and GWB isn't at fault...

or...

2. They're clinically mentally ill from drinking greeeen anti freeze provided by eGore.

...morons.

Shoes4Industry said...

We've read the information, it's incomplete and a cover up.

What's the problem with a REAL INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION?

What are you afraid of?

The truth?

Lee said...

We aren't afraid of the truth because we only know what is true. It is the Trufers that don't beleive the true story. That's your problem - ball in your court.
Put up or shut up.

Shoes4Industry said...

Put up what? We do not purport to know what happened on 9/11 because the Governments investigation was incomplete and biased. What part of the term "cover-up" don't you understand?

And it' not about hating Bush, that's a separate issue...

Shoes4Industry said...

It is the Trufers that don't beleive the true story.

"Story" is right as in FICTION.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

"We've read the information, it's incomplete and a cover up."

No, you have not.

If you'd read the information from witnesses about what happened to WTC 7 you'd know there was a 20+ story gash in the front of it.

You'd know that it was a unique design to allow for construction over a power substation that was not designed to have that large a building constructed over it.

You'd know that there was a pressurized fuel line for emergency power generators that fed the fire for almost 8 hours.

You'd know that they knew the building was going to come down before approx noon that day from the damage inflicted by the spire from the tower.

You don't know jack...

Shoes4Industry said...

"If you'd read the information from witnesses about what happened to WTC 7 you'd know there was a 20+ story gash in the front of it."

Go back look at the Oklahoma Fed building bombing, the WHOLE front was blown off, yet it did not "implode"

Next!

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

"You don't know jack..."

Glad you proved my point. TY

Shirley Heezgay! said...

Um, it doesn't seem like your point was proven at all.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Proved my point perfectly..you goof balls keep trying to equate things that have absolutely NOTHING to do with 9/11 as though they all have some mysterious something or other in common.

Typical tactics when your side of a debate has no basis in fact.

You still can't answer a simple question without twisting, diverting, obsfucating, and avoiding a straight, single point.

Before 9/11, when have airliners ever crashed into 110 story buildings? Very simple question...for simple minds...

Anonymous said...

Simple mind is right.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Glad you realize your own shortcomings. So answer the question.

Anonymous said...

When have Steel and Concrete buildings collapsed after burning for an HOUR?

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Just can't do it can ya'?

"You still can't answer a simple question without twisting, diverting, obsfucating, and avoiding a straight, single point.

Before 9/11, when have airliners ever crashed into 110 story buildings? Very simple question...for simple minds..."

Come on...I dare ya'.

Shoes4Industry said...

no, but what does that have to do with anything including 7WTC?

Have any steel and concrete buildings ever COLLAPSED due to fire before?

When has a building ever collapsed into the path of MOST resistance, Einstein?

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Compared to you....yes, I am Einstein.

Shoes4Industry said...

Then maybe you could answer that question...

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

It has nothing to do with 9/11. Why waste the time?

Shoes4Industry said...

We thought "wasting time" was your forte...