Friday, October 12, 2007

Another Professor Questions 9/11!

"The 9/11 tragedy is the most successful and most perverse publicity stunt in the history of public relations," wrote Lynn Margulis, geosciences professor at UMass, in her statement on

"I suggest that those of us aware and concerned demand that the glaringly erroneous official account of 9/11 be dismissed as a fraud and a new thorough and impartial investigation be undertaken," she added.

Beyond her role as a Sept. 11 doubter, Margulis has had a successful career in geosciences. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and in 1998, the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. announced it would archive her papers there permanently. She taught at Boston University for 22 years before moving to UMass. Margulis has written over 130 scientific papers and books and has done extensive research on evolution, especially pertaining to the theory of symbiogenesis.

Throughout her career, she has been awarded the National Medal of Science, the nation's highest honor for scientific achievement, as well as the Procter Prize from Sigma Xi, the scientific research society of which she was president from 2005-06.


H Nicole said...

And a woman! Good find, Shoes. Other than a Nobel Prize, you really can't get much better than being a member of the National Academy of Sciences for scientific prestige in the US. I'd say this is probably the most respectable (on paper) genuine academic scientist I've seen in the Truth Movement so far.

H Nicole said...

I wonder what she has to say about the possibility of man-made earthquakes. Hmmm.

H Nicole said...

It's fax time again!

This is similar to the Fax I sent to all 100 US Senators on September 20, 2007, except I've added a few more links of evidence, not the least of which is the informative video footage posted on this site on October 10, 2007.

It is interesting that in my checks to see if all the links were still working properly since 9/20/07, only one was no longer available online -- the 300 page thesis by (now) Dr. Granier from Texas Tech about thermite nanoparticles. Fortunately, I had saved that file and am now making it available from my own website.

I may be away from home for a while without any Internet access, so if my homies here at S4I don't hear from me, not to worry. I'll be partying with a different set of homies elsewhere!


October 14, 2007

RE: Your Oath of Office and Possible Acts of Treason

Dear United States Representative and Fellow Citizen:

This is an update and summary of some of the strongest publicly available evidence that implicates top officials in the US government for carrying out heinous crimes against humanity in a false flag attack against innocent US civilians on 9/11/01. A similar letter was sent to every member of the US Senate on September 20, 2007.

Despite any proclamations of "not knowing" or "ignorance of the facts" that may be presented as a defense at a future trial, any United States Representative in Congress who continues to support the current administration and its various illegal activities and occupations after having knowledge of the evidence presented in this letter today is tantamount to nothing short of treason and a violation of an oath to protect the US Constitution from enemies from within.

1. The planes were probably not hijacked on 9/11/01, at least not as claimed. If they were, it would have been the first successful hijackings of 757’s and 767’s in the history of the aircraft . Effective anti-hijacking capabilities were available long before 2001 and may have been installed in all 757’s and 767’s at the time of the purported hijackings.

2. The plane that hit WTC2 may not have been a regular commercial airliner, and/or the facades of WTC2 where the plane hit may have somehow been modified, because the plane apparently pierced right through the building with its nose mostly still in tact as it came out the other side.
- (see time marker 21:20)
- (see time markers 6:30, 5:25, and 4:55)
- (see time markers 0:58-1:04 and 1:56-2:06 for what appears to be a piece of the plane on fire hanging outside WTC2)
- (see the October 10, 2007, video posting and comments therein)

3. It is highly improbable for each of the world trade center towers to be so completely dustified, and in such a short time span (10-15 seconds), without some input of energy other than from gravity.
- Any physics textbook discussion on conservation of mass, energy, and momentum.

4. There are countless observations that are consistent with the idea that a chemical breakdown of materials, especially iron and steel, occurred (or continued to occur) after the world trade center towers had been destroyed.
- (see time markers 4:45-5:05 and 7:14-7:20 and beyond for what appears to be the beginning and the continuation, respectively, of a possible chemical breakdown or "fuming" of the mostly-steel leeward facade of WTC1 just after a seemingly reactive dust cloud from the destruction of WTC2 came in contact with it).
- (see time marker 17:15-17:30 for what appears to be a steel spire turning to dust after the destruction of WTC1; also see for a close up view of the same video clip).
- (see photo evidence and audio discussions of observed "fuming" and "toasted car" phenomena, including possible acts of covering up evidence of fuming phenomena with dirt, debris, and the spread of inaccurate, misleading information about the purported discovery of "molten steel" during the clean-up at ground zero)
- (additional photo evidence of possible fuming and toasted car phenomena and possible cover-up of the phenomena with dirt at the Pentagon).

5. As one of many alternative explanations, technology exists that would allow the inconspicuous coating of much of the steel frame interior of the WTC towers with explosive material (say instead of the purported fire protective coating that was continuously being "re-applied" throughout the lives of the buildings), a material that may later have been triggered with a laser from a remote location.
- (nanoparticle-sized thermite is one possible laser-triggered explosive material)
- (a recent advance in laser technology called "ultrashort laser pulsing" might allow for much faster, more explosive chemical reaction times for laser induced chemical reactions).
- (directed energy laser guns developed by Raytheon is a technology that may have been used to trigger chemical explosions in the WTC towers on 9/11/01).

6. It is evident just from the video footage alone that WTC 7 was purposely and skillfully destroyed by a different mechanism from the WTC towers because, unlike the WTC towers which were turned to dust from the top down, WTC 7 was destroyed from the bottom up and a relatively large amount of the building survived as a heap pile. The destruction of WTC 7 is not counted here as evidence of crimes against humanity, however, because nobody was killed in its purposeful destruction.

This is only a partial list and does not include additional evidence that can and should be obtained through the investigative powers of the United States Congress.


H. Nicole Young, Ph.D., Representative of the Citizens of the United States of America (ROC-USA)
This letter also posted at:

America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter, and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.
~Abraham Lincoln

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...


H Nicole said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
H Nicole said...

Whoops -- if the link above to Dr. Granier's thesis doesn't work, try this...

Granier's thesis adviser is Prof. Michelle Pantoya of Texas Tech, who won a Presidential Early Career Award for
Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) from the United States Department of Defense in 2004. She got to meet President Bush at an awards ceremony on May 4, 2004.

Here is a brief synopsis of the research work...

"A Nanoparticle with a Big Bang"

H Nicole said...

Hey, remember our friend Senator Orrin Hatch? Look what he's up to these days...

"Last week, Pelosi said Democrats were making some progress and hoped to "peel off about 14 votes" to override the veto. Republicans such as Sen. Charles Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, who sided with Democrats on the vetoed bill, also were working to sway wavering House GOP lawmakers."

From: Democrats: Children will get insurance

Shoes4Industry said...

October 15, 2007

Op-Ed Columnist
Gore Derangement Syndrome

On the day after Al Gore shared the Nobel Peace Prize, The Wall Street
Journal¹s editors couldn¹t even bring themselves to mention Mr. Gore¹s name.
Instead, they devoted their editorial to a long list of people they thought
deserved the prize more.

And at National Review Online, Iain Murray suggested that the prize should
have been shared with ³that well-known peace campaigner Osama bin Laden, who
implicitly endorsed Gore¹s stance.² You see, bin Laden once said something
about climate change ‹ therefore, anyone who talks about climate change is a
friend of the terrorists.

What is it about Mr. Gore that drives right-wingers insane?

Partly it¹s a reaction to what happened in 2000, when the American people
chose Mr. Gore but his opponent somehow ended up in the White House. Both
the personality cult the right tried to build around President Bush and the
often hysterical denigration of Mr. Gore were, I believe, largely motivated
by the desire to expunge the stain of illegitimacy from the Bush

And now that Mr. Bush has proved himself utterly the wrong man for the job ‹
to be, in fact, the best president Al Qaeda¹s recruiters could have hoped
for ‹ the symptoms of Gore derangement syndrome have grown even more

The worst thing about Mr. Gore, from the conservative point of view, is that
he keeps being right. In 1992, George H. W. Bush mocked him as the ³ozone
man,² but three years later the scientists who discovered the threat to the
ozone layer won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 2002 he warned that if we
invaded Iraq, ³the resulting chaos could easily pose a far greater danger to
the United States than we presently face from Saddam.² And so it has proved.

But Gore hatred is more than personal. When National Review decided to name
its anti-environmental blog Planet Gore, it was trying to discredit the
message as well as the messenger. For the truth Mr. Gore has been telling
about how human activities are changing the climate isn¹t just inconvenient.
For conservatives, it¹s deeply threatening.

Consider the policy implications of taking climate change seriously.

³We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals,² said
F.D.R. ³We know now that it is bad economics.² These words apply perfectly
to climate change. It¹s in the interest of most people (and especially their
descendants) that somebody do something to reduce emissions of carbon
dioxide and other greenhouse gases, but each individual would like that
somebody to be somebody else. Leave it up to the free market, and in a few
generations Florida will be underwater.

The solution to such conflicts between self-interest and the common good is
to provide individuals with an incentive to do the right thing. In this
case, people have to be given a reason to cut back on greenhouse gas
emissions, either by requiring that they pay a tax on emissions or by
requiring that they buy emission permits, which has pretty much the same
effects as an emissions tax. We know that such policies work: the U.S. ³cap
and trade² system of emission permits on sulfur dioxide has been highly
successful at reducing acid rain.

Climate change is, however, harder to deal with than acid rain, because the
causes are global. The sulfuric acid in America¹s lakes mainly comes from
coal burned in U.S. power plants, but the carbon dioxide in America¹s air
comes from coal and oil burned around the planet ‹ and a ton of coal burned
in China has the same effect on the future climate as a ton of coal burned
here. So dealing with climate change not only requires new taxes or their
equivalent; it also requires international negotiations in which the United
States will have to give as well as get.

Everything I¹ve just said should be uncontroversial ‹ but imagine the
reception a Republican candidate for president would receive if he
acknowledged these truths at the next debate. Today, being a good Republican
means believing that taxes should always be cut, never raised. It also means
believing that we should bomb and bully foreigners, not negotiate with them.

So if science says that we have a big problem that can¹t be solved with tax
cuts or bombs ‹ well, the science must be rejected, and the scientists must
be slimed. For example, Investor¹s Business Daily recently declared that the
prominence of James Hansen, the NASA researcher who first made climate
change a national issue two decades ago, is actually due to the nefarious
schemes of ‹ who else? ‹ George Soros.

Which brings us to the biggest reason the right hates Mr. Gore: in his case
the smear campaign has failed. He¹s taken everything they could throw at
him, and emerged more respected, and more credible, than ever.And it drives
them crazy.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

"when the American people
chose Mr. Gore"..actually they didn't. Another lie that is continually bandied about. They chose GWB as POTUS.

"When Al Gore lost his bid to become the country’s first “Environment President,” many of us thought the “global warming” scare would finally come to a well-deserved end. That hasn’t happened, despite eight good reasons this scam should finally be put to rest.

It’s B-a-a-ck!

Similar scares orchestrated by radical environmentalists in the past--such as Alar, global cooling, the “population bomb,” and electromagnetic fields--were eventually debunked by scientists and no longer appear in the speeches or platforms of public officials. The New York Times recently endorsed more widespread use of DDT to combat malaria, proving Rachel Carson’s anti-pesticide gospel is no longer sacrosanct even with the liberal elite.

The scientific case against catastrophic global warming is at least as strong as the case for DDT, but the global warming scare hasn’t gone away. President Bush is waffling on the issue, rightly opposing the Kyoto Protocol and focusing on research and voluntary projects, but wrongly allowing his administration to support calls for creating “transferrable emission credits” for greenhouse gas reductions. Such credits would build political and economic support for a Kyoto-like cap on greenhouse gas emissions.

At the state level, some 23 states have already adopted caps on greenhouse gas emissions or goals for replacing fossil fuels with alternative energy sources. These efforts are doomed to be costly failures, as a new Heartland Policy Study by Dr. Jay Lehr and James Taylor documents. Instead of concentrating on balancing state budgets, some legislators will be working to pass their own “mini-Kyotos.”

Eight Reasons to End the Scam

Concern over “global warming” is overblown and misdirected. What follows are eight reasons why we should pull the plug on this scam before it destroys billions of dollars of wealth and millions of jobs.

1. Most scientists do not believe human activities threaten to disrupt the Earth’s climate. More than 17,000 scientists have signed a petition circulated by the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine saying, in part, “there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.” (Go to for the complete petition and names of signers.) Surveys of climatologists show similar skepticism.

2. Our most reliable sources of temperature data show no global warming trend. Satellite readings of temperatures in the lower troposphere (an area scientists predict would immediately reflect any global warming) show no warming since readings began 23 years ago. These readings are accurate to within 0.01ÂșC, and are consistent with data from weather balloons. Only land-based temperature stations show a warming trend, and these stations do not cover the entire globe, are often contaminated by heat generated by nearby urban development, and are subject to human error.

3. Global climate computer models are too crude to predict future climate changes. All predictions of global warming are based on computer models, not historical data. In order to get their models to produce predictions that are close to their designers’ expectations, modelers resort to “flux adjustments” that can be 25 times larger than the effect of doubling carbon dioxide concentrations, the supposed trigger for global warming. Richard A. Kerr, a writer for Science, says “climate modelers have been ‘cheating’ for so long it’s almost become respectable.”

4. The IPCC did not prove that human activities are causing global warming. Alarmists frequently quote the executive summaries of reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a United Nations organization, to support their predictions. But here is what the IPCC’s latest report, Climate Change 2001, actually says about predicting the future climate: “The Earth’s atmosphere-ocean dynamics is chaotic: its evolution is sensitive to small perturbations in initial conditions. This sensitivity limits our ability to predict the detailed evolution of weather; inevitable errors and uncertainties in the starting conditions of a weather forecast amplify through the forecast. As well as uncertainty in initial conditions, such predictions are also degraded by errors and uncertainties in our ability to represent accurately the significant climate processes.”

5. A modest amount of global warming, should it occur, would be beneficial to the natural world and to human civilization. Temperatures during the Medieval Warm Period (roughly 800 to 1200 AD), which allowed the Vikings to settle presently inhospitable Greenland, were higher than even the worst-case scenario reported by the IPCC. The period from about 5000-3000 BC, known as the “climatic optimum,” was even warmer and marked “a time when mankind began to build its first civilizations,” observe James Plummer and Frances B. Smith in a study for Consumer Alert. “There is good reason to believe that a warmer climate would have a similar effect on the health and welfare of our own far more advanced and adaptable civilization today.”

6. Efforts to quickly reduce human greenhouse gas emissions would be costly and would not stop Earth’s climate from changing. Reducing U.S. carbon dioxide emissions to 7 percent below 1990’s levels by the year 2012--the target set by the Kyoto Protocol--would require higher energy taxes and regulations causing the nation to lose 2.4 million jobs and $300 billion in annual economic output. Average household income nationwide would fall by $2,700, and state tax revenues would decline by $93.1 billion due to less taxable earned income and sales, and lower property values. Full implementation of the Kyoto Protocol by all participating nations would reduce global temperature in the year 2100 by a mere 0.14 degrees Celsius.

7. Efforts by state governments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions are even more expensive and threaten to bust state budgets. After raising their spending with reckless abandon during the 1990s, states now face a cumulative projected deficit of more than $90 billion. Incredibly, most states nevertheless persist in backing unnecessary and expensive greenhouse gas reduction programs. New Jersey, for example, collects $358 million a year in utility taxes to fund greenhouse gas reduction programs. Such programs will have no impact on global greenhouse gas emissions. All they do is destroy jobs and waste money.

8. The best strategy to pursue is “no regrets.” The alternative to demands for immediate action to “stop global warming” is not to do nothing. The best strategy is to invest in atmospheric research now and in reducing emissions sometime in the future if the science becomes more compelling. In the meantime, investments should be made to reduce emissions only when such investments make economic sense in their own right.

This strategy is called “no regrets,” and it is roughly what the Bush administration has been doing. The U.S. spends more on global warming research each year than the entire rest of the world combined, and American businesses are leading the way in demonstrating new technologies for reducing and sequestering greenhouse gas emissions.

Time for Common Sense

The global warming scare has enabled environmental advocacy groups to raise billions of dollars in contributions and government grants. It has given politicians (from Al Gore down) opportunities to pose as prophets of doom and slayers of evil corporations. And it has given bureaucrats at all levels of government, from the United Nations to city councils, powers that threaten our jobs and individual liberty.

It is time for common sense to return to the debate over protecting the environment. An excellent first step would be to end the “global warming” scam."

Algore is still not the POTUS and never will be. GW is a SCAM that is being promoted to bilk the underclass out of their hardearned money and further enrich the pockets of the fear mongers.

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

Just in case you might actually want to learn something...

CO2 is 3/10,000ths of the Earth's atmosphere. DUH!!

Lee said... poll 10/15/07:

Now that Al Gore has won the Nobel Prize is he more likely to make a bid for the White House?

More Likely; he knows he's hot and knows it 14%

Less Likely; too busy saving the planet 24%


Guess he'd probably LOSE AGAIN!

Shoes4Industry said...

Now ask yourself, what possible motive would someone have to MAKE UP and LIE about Global Warming? To what end?

It's not like the govenment's 9/11 fantasy story about jets bringing down buildings that was used to further their illegal take-over of this country and others...

Shoes4Industry said...

"GW is a SCAM that is being promoted to bilk the underclass out of their hardearned money and further enrich the pockets of the fear mongers."

I think you mean "G.W.B."

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

"Now ask yourself, what possible motive would someone have to MAKE UP and LIE about Global Warming? To what end?"

DUH! M-O-N-E-Y? ya' reckon?

Anonymous said...

The following is a copy of an article written by Spanish writer Sebastian
Vilar Rodrigez and published in a Spanish newspaper on 5-22-07. It doesn't
take much imagination to extrapolate the message to the rest of Europe - and
possibly to the rest of the world.


Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:30:20 -0500

By Sebastian Vilar Rodrigez(*)

I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly
discovered a terrible truth - Europe died in Auschwitz .
We killed six million Jews and replaced them with 20
million Muslims. In Auschwitz we burned a culture,
thought, creativity, talent. We destroyed the chosen
people, truly chosen, because they produced great and
wonderful people who changed the world.

The contribution of this people is felt in all areas of
life: science, art, international trade, and above all,
as the conscience of the world. These are the people
we burned.

And under the pretense of tolerance, and because we
wanted to prove to ourselves that we were cured of the
disease of racism, we opened our gates to 20 million
Muslims, who brought us stupidity and ignorance,
religious extremism and lack of tolerance, crime and
poverty, due to an unwillingness to work and support
their families with pride.

They have blown up our trains and turned our beautiful

Spanish cities into the third world, drowning in filth and crime.

Shut up in the apartments they receive free from the
gove rnment, they plan the murder and destruction of
their naive hosts.

And thus, in our misery, we have exchanged culture for
fanatical hatred, creative skill for destructive skill, intelligence for
backwardness and superstition.

We have exchanged the pursuit of peace of the Jews of
Europe and their talent for hoping for a better future
for their children, their determined clinging to life
because life is holy, for those who pursue death, for
people consumed by the desire for death for themselves
and others, for our children and theirs.

What a terrible mistake was made by miserable Europe.

A lot of Americans have bec! ome so i nsulated from reality
that they imagine America can suffer defeat without any inconvenience to

Absolutely No Profiling! Pause a moment, reflect back, and take the
following multiple choice test.

These events are actual events from history. They really happened! Do you

1. 1968 Bobby Kennedy was shot and killed by
a. Superman
b. Jay Leno
c. Harry Potter
d.. A Muslim male extremist between the ages of 17 and 40

2. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred
a. Olga Corbett
b. Sitting Bull
c. Arnold Schwarzenegger
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

3. In 1979, the US embassy in Iran was taken over by:
a. Lost Norwegians
b. Elvis
c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old&! nbsp;wom en
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

4. During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by:
a. John Dillinger
b. The King of Sweden
c. The Boy Scouts
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

5. In 1983, the US Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by:
a. A pizza delivery boy
b. Pee Wee Herman
c. Geraldo Rivera
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

6. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old
American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by:
a. The Smurfs
b. Davey Jones
c. The Little Mermaid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

7. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijac! ked at < SPAN id=EC_lw_1188833002_60 style="CURSOR: hand">Athens, and a US Navy diver
trying to rescue
passengers was murdered by:
a. Captain Kidd
b. Charles Lindberg
c. Mother Teresa
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

8. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by:
a. Scooby Doo
b. The Tooth Fairy and The Sundance Kid
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

9. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by:
a. Richard Simmons
b. Grandma Moses
c. Michael Jordan
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

10. In 1998, the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by:
a. Mr. Rogers
b. Hillary Clinton, to distract attention from Wild Bill's women problems
c. The World Wrestling Federation
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles
to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed
into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted and crashed by the passengers.
Thousands of people were killed by:
a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd
b. The Supreme Court of Florida
c. Mr. Bean
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against:
a. Enron
b. The Lutheran Church
c. The NFL
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by:
a. Bonnie and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

No, I really don't see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you? So, to
ensure we Americans never offend anyone, particularly fanatics intent on
killing us, airport security screeners will no longer be allowed to profile
certain people. They must conduct random searches of 80-year-o! ld women , little
kids, airline pilots with proper identification, secret agents who are
members of the President's security detail, 85-year old Congressmen with metal
hips, and Medal of Honor winner and former Governor Joe Foss, but leave
Muslim Males between the ages 17 and 40 alone lest they be guilty of profiling.
Let's send this to as many people as we can so that the Gloria Allreds and
other dunder-headed attorneys along with Federal Justices that want to thwart
common sense, feel ashamed of themselves -- if they have any such sense ..

As the writer of the award winning story "Forrest Gump" so aptly put it,
"Stupid is as stupid does."

Come on people wake up!!! Keep this going. Our Country and our troops
need our support.

Shoes4Industry said...

We do NOT support the troops.

Shoes4Industry said...

13. Between 2002 and 2007 thousands of innocent Iraqis were murdered by the direct action of:
a. Bonnie and Clyde
b. Captain Kangaroo
c. Billy Graham
d. George W. Bush

LifeBeginsAt200MPH said...

...or...the correct answer...

E. Iraqi insurgents slaughtering their own people trying to bring back a system of terror and intimidation as practiced under Extremist Islamic Fundamentalism.

"Stupid is as stupid does."

And Algore is still not the POTUS.

Lee said...

Glad to see you FINALLY admitted that you DO NOT SUPPORT THE TROOPS. What a surprise!!

Lee said...

Here is another Wake up America message --

This is our country! Not yours and because I make this statement DOES NOT mean I'm against immigration!!

You Are Welcom In Our Country
Welcometo come the way everyone
else has: Get a sponsor !
Get a place to lay your
Get a job!
Live by OUR rules!
Pay YOUR taxes!


If YOU don't want to pass this one for fear of OFFENDING someone, then YOU ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM!

When will American's STOP giving away their RIGHTS???

We've gone so far the other way (left)...bent over backwards not to OFFEND anyone. But it seems no one care about the AMERICAN that's being offended.


Actually, it's the two-bit left-wing crooked politicans! (Polosi, Reed, Schumer & Kennedy)